Elucidating the role of Trp105 in the KPC‐2 β‐lactamase

Abstract

The molecular basis of resistance to β‐lactams and β‐lactam‐β‐lactamase inhibitor combinations in the KPC family of class A enzymes is of extreme importance to the future design of effective β‐lactam therapy. Recent crystal structures of KPC‐2 and other class A β‐lactamases suggest that Ambler position Trp105 may be of importance in binding β‐lactam compounds. Based on this notion, we explored the role of residue Trp105 in KPC‐2 by conducting site‐saturation mutagenesis at this position. Escherichia coli DH10B cells expressing the Trp105Phe, ‐Tyr, ‐Asn, and ‐His KPC‐2 variants possessed minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) similar to E. coli cells expressing wild type (WT) KPC‐2. Interestingly, most of the variants showed increased MICs to ampicillin‐clavulanic acid but not to ampicillin‐sulbactam or piperacillin‐tazobactam. To explain the biochemical basis of this behavior, four variants (Trp105Phe, ‐Asn, ‐Leu, and ‐Val) were studied in detail. Consistent with the MIC data, the Trp105Phe β‐lactamase displayed improved catalytic efficiencies, k_cat/K_m, toward piperacillin, cephalothin, and nitrocefin, but slightly decreased k_cat/K_m toward cefotaxime and imipenem when compared to WT β‐lactamase. The Trp105Asn variant exhibited increased K_ms for all substrates. In contrast, the Trp105Leu and ‐Val substituted enzymes demonstrated notably decreased catalytic efficiencies (k_cat/K_m) for all substrates. With respect to clavulanic acid, the K_is and partition ratios were increased for the Trp105Phe, ‐Asn, and ‐Val variants. We conclude that interactions between Trp105 of KPC‐2 and the β‐lactam are essential for hydrolysis of substrates. Taken together, kinetic and molecular modeling studies define the role of Trp105 in β‐lactam and β‐lactamase inhibitor discrimination.