Lactating dairy cows adapt quickly to being milked by an automatic milking system
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- Published by American Dairy Science Association in Journal of Dairy Science
- Vol. 95 (3), 1575-1584
- https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4710
Abstract
Transitioning a dairy herd to an automatic milking system (AMS) from a conventional parlor system may be stressful for the cow, as many changes occur during this process. Chronic stress may affect the welfare of the cow, and acute stress during milking can decrease milk yield. Therefore, it is important to quantify if and how long stress during adaptation to an AMS might persist. Seventy-seven cows with acceptable udder and teat conformation that would not interfere with adaptation to the AMS and that were lactating n = 18, early [0 to 100 d in milk (DIM)]; n = 27, mid (100 to 200 DIM); and n = 32, late (200+ DIM) for the full duration of the project were chosen for observation. All cows had been milked previously in a double-6 herringbone milking parlor. Four stress-related behaviors [step-kick behavior both before and after attachment of teat cups, elimination (urination and defecation instances), and vocalization] were recorded during milking by trained observers, whereas milk yield was automatically recorded by the AMS. Data were collected for 24-h periods beginning on the day the cows transitioned to milking in the AMS (d 0), and on d 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 thereafter. Instances of elimination and vocalization were greater on d 0 compared with all other days (elimination: d 0 = 3.1 ± 0.09, d 1 = 0.6 ± 0.07, and 0 ± 0 instances thereafter; vocalization: d 0 = 1.7 ± 0.07, d 1 = 0.05 ± 0.04, and 0 ± 0 instances thereafter). Milk yield increased between d 0 (18.3 ± 1.7 kg) and d 1 (30.9 ± 1.7 kg). Primiparous cows (n=28) were more likely than multiparous cows (n = 49) to display step-kick behaviors both before (8.3 ± 2.5; 5.5 ± 0.6, respectively) and after (15.6 ± 2.4; 13.3 ± 1.3, respectively) teat cup attachment during milking. Eight days after introducing the cows to the AMS, over 60% of the herd was milking voluntarily and 95% of the herd was milking voluntarily within a month, which suggests that cows did not find the AMS aversive. Greater elimination and vocalization behavior and lower milk yield on d 0 relative to subsequent days indicated initial stress and discomfort with the milking process in the new system; however, the cows appeared to adapt within 24h.Keywords
Funding Information
- Michigan State University AgBioResearch
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Training methods for introducing cows to a pasture-based automatic milking systemApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 2011
- Restlessness behaviour, heart rate and heart-rate variability of dairy cows milked in two types of automatic milking systems and auto-tandem milking parloursApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008
- The management of intensive dairy farms can be improved for better welfare and milk yieldLivestock Science, 2006
- Stress Responses during Milking; Comparing Conventional and Automatic Milking in Primiparous Dairy CowsJournal of Dairy Science, 2002
- Human contact and the effects of acute stress on cows at milkingApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 2001
- Fear of People by Cows and Effects on Milk Yield, Behavior, and Heart Rate at MilkingJournal of Dairy Science, 1999
- The feasibility of using vocalization scoring as an indicator of poor welfare during cattle slaughterApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 1998
- Assessment of stress during handling and transport.Journal of Animal Science, 1997
- Interpreting the behaviour of calves in an open-field test: a factor analysisApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 1995
- Behavioral agitation during handling of cattle is persistent over timeApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 1993