The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?
Top Cited Papers
- 22 November 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 298 (5598), 1569-1579
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
Abstract
We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be profitably wedded to work in evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, and neuroscience. We submit that a distinction should be made between the faculty of language in the broad sense (FLB) and in the narrow sense (FLN). FLB includes a sensory-motor system, a conceptual-intentional system, and the computational mechanisms for recursion, providing the capacity to generate an infinite range of expressions from a finite set of elements. We hypothesize that FLN only includes recursion and is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language. We further argue that FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language, hence comparative studies might look for evidence of such computations outside of the domain of communication (for example, number, navigation, and social relations).Keywords
This publication has 93 references indexed in Scilit:
- RETRACTED: Rule learning by cotton-top tamarinsCognition, 2002
- The biological basis of speech: What to infer from talking to the animals.Psychological Review, 2001
- Language Discrimination by Human Newborns and by Cotton-Top Tamarin MonkeysScience, 2000
- Cortical Mechanisms of Human ImitationScience, 1999
- Imitation, memory, and the representation of personsInfant Behavior and Development, 1994
- HOW DOES EVOLUTION DESIGN A BRAIN CAPABLE OF LEARNING LANGUAGE?Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1993
- “Gavagai!” or the future history of the animal language controversyCognition, 1985
- Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphinsCognition, 1984
- Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The “Panglossian paradigm” defendedBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1983
- Hearing lips and seeing voicesNature, 1976