INCREASED ACCURACY OF BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE OBTAINED BY EXTENDED NEEDLE BIOPSY
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 172 (6 Part 1), 2224-2226
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000144456.67352.63
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate tumor grading is critical for adequate prostate cancer treatment. Nonetheless, the Gleason score of standard sextant biopsy correctly predicts the Gleason score of the radical prostatectomy specimen in about 50% of cases. We investigated if extended needle biopsy could improve biopsy Gleason score accuracy. Materials and Methods: Laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy was performed in 135 patients. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 89 cases by standard sextant transrectal (6 to 8 cores) biopsy and in 46 by extended needle (12 core transperineal under transrectal guidance) biopsy. Preoperative evaluation included digital rectal examination, prostatic specific antigen measurement, transrectal ultrasonography and endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in all patients. All biopsy and prostatectomy specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist. Results: Clinical characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. The concordance between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score was 32 of 46 cases (70%) and 44 of 89 (49%) for 12 core and standard transrectal biopsy, respectively (z test p = 0.0127). Biopsy under grading was found in 11 of 46 cases (24%) and 35 of 89 (39%) (z test p = 0.0366), and biopsy over grading was found in 3 of 46 (6%) and 10 of 89 (11%) (z test p = 0.1894) with 12 core and standard transrectal biopsy, respectively. Primary Gleason pattern was predicted exactly by biopsy in 40 of 46 cases (87%) and 56 of 89 (63%) with 12 core and standard sextant biopsy, respectively (z test p = 0.0018). Conclusions: Extended needle biopsy significantly increases the accuracy of biopsy Gleason score for assessing final prostate cancer grade.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using the percentage of biopsy cores positive for cancer, pretreatment PSA, and highest biopsy Gleason sum to predict pathologic stage after radical prostatectomy: the center for prostate disease research nomogramsUrology, 2003
- Extended Prostate Needle Biopsy Improves Concordance Of Gleason Grading Between Prostate Needle Biopsy And Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 2003
- Gleason score on biopsy: is it reliable for predicting the final grade on pathology?BJU International, 2002
- THE VALUE OF A SINGLE BIOPSY WITH 12 TRANSPERINEAL CORES FOR DETECTING PROSTATE CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH ELEVATED PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGENJournal of Urology, 2001
- USE OF GLEASON SCORE, PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, SEMINAL VESICLE AND MARGIN STATUS TO PREDICT BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2001
- Patterns of prostate cancer biopsy grading:Trends and clinical implicationsInternational Journal of Cancer, 2000
- Accuracy of Biopsy Gleason Scores from a Large Uropathology Laboratory: Use of a Diagnostic Protocol to Minimize Observer VariabilityUrology, 1998
- Gleason Scores from Prostate Biopsies Obtained with 18-Gauge Biopsy Needles Poorly Predict Gleason Scores of Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensEuropean Urology, 1998
- Predictive accuracy of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: correlations to matched prostatectomy specimensUrology, 1997
- Combination of Prostate-Specific Antigen, Clinical Stage, and Gleason Score to Predict Pathological Stage of Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1997