Changes in Cancer Registry Coding for Lymphoma Subtypes: Reliability Over Time and Relevance for Surveillance and Study
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 15 (4), 630-638
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0549
Abstract
Because lymphoma comprises numerous histologic subtypes, understanding the reasons for ongoing increases in its incidence requires surveillance and etiologic study of these subtypes. However, this research has been hindered by many coexisting classification schemes. The Revised European American classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms (REAL)/WHO system developed in 1994 and now used in clinical settings was not incorporated into the International Classification of Diseases-Oncology (ICD-O), used by cancer registries, until the release of the third edition (ICD-O-3) in 2001. Studies including patients diagnosed before 2001 may have codes from earlier ICD-O versions that must be converted to ICD-O-3 and have higher proportions of unclassified (e.g., lymphoma and not otherwise specified) cases. To better understand (a) the agreement of computer-converted ICD-O-3 codes to ICD-O-3 codes generated directly from diagnostic pathology reports and (b) the reproducibility of unclassified status, we reviewed a population-based series of diagnostic pathology reports for lymphoma patients diagnosed before (1988-1994; n = 1,493) and after (1998-2000; n = 1,527) the REAL/WHO scheme was introduced. Overall, computer- and coder-assigned ICD-O-3 codes agreed for 77% of patients in both groups and improved slightly (82%) when codes were grouped. The most common lymphoma subtypes, diffuse large B cell and follicular, had relatively good reliability (84-89%) throughout the study period. T-cell and natural killer cell lymphomas had worse agreement than B-cell lymphomas, even when grouped. Many (42-43%) lymphomas reported as unclassifiable could be assigned a subtype upon pathology report review. These findings suggest that the study of lymphoma subtypes could be improved by (a) use of more standardized terminology in pathology reports, (b) grouping individual ICD-O-3 codes to reduce misclassification bias, and (c) routine secondary editing of unclassified lymphomas by central cancer registries. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(4):630–8)Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tobacco use and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from a population-based case–control study in the San Francisco Bay Area, CaliforniaCancer Causes & Control, 2005
- Polymorphisms and haplotypes in folate-metabolizing genes and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphomaBlood, 2004
- Use of the WHO lymphoma classification in a population-based epidemiological studyAnnals of Oncology, 2004
- Expert Review of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas in a Population-Based Cancer RegistryCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2004
- Prior history of allergies and pancreatic cancer in the San Francisco Bay area.American Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- Comparison of Interviewed and Non-Interviewed Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Patients in the San Francisco Bay AreaAnnals of Epidemiology, 2002
- DNA Copy Number Alterations in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Patients With Diffuse Large-Cell LymphomasJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001
- Hair-color products and risk for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a population-based study in the San Francisco bay area.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Homosexual Men in the San Francisco Bay Area:JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 1997
- Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Homosexual Men in the San Francisco Bay Area:JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 1997