Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Neuroscience
- Vol. 2 (4), 375-381
- https://doi.org/10.1038/7286
Abstract
Shifting attention away from a visual stimulus reduces, but does not abolish, visual discrimination performance. This residual vision with 'poor' attention can be compared to normal vision with 'full' attention to reveal how attention alters visual perception. We report large differences between residual and normal visual thresholds for discriminating the orientation or spatial frequency of simple patterns, and smaller differences for discriminating contrast. A computational model, in which attention activates a winner-take-all competition among overlapping visual filters, quantitatively accounts for all observations. Our model predicts that the effects of attention on visual cortical neurons include increased contrast gain as well as sharper tuning to orientation and spatial frequency.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evolving Concepts of Spatial Channels in Vision: From Independence to Nonlinear InteractionsPerception, 1997
- Isolating Excitatory and Inhibitory Nonlinear Spatial Interactions Involved in Contrast DetectionVision Research, 1996
- Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new modelJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1994
- Summation and Division by Neurons in Primate Visual CortexScience, 1994
- Spatial frequency adaptation and contrast gain controlVision Research, 1993
- Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discriminationVision Research, 1990
- Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attentionPerception & Psychophysics, 1987
- Contrast masking in human visionJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1980
- A transducer function for threshold and suprathreshold human visionBiological Cybernetics, 1980
- Grating contrast: Discrimination may be better than detectionVision Research, 1974