Use of prostate-specific antigen and tumor volume in predicting needle biopsy grading error
- 31 May 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Urology
- Vol. 45 (5), 807-812
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80088-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Histologic Grade, DNA Ploidy, and Intraglandular Tumor Extent as Indicators of Tumor Progression of Clinical Stage B Prostatic CarcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1991
- Histologic differentiation, cancer volume, and pelvic lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the prostateCancer, 1990
- Flow Cytometric Determination of Ploidy in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison with Seminal Vesicle Involvement and Histopáthglogicál Grading as a Predictor of Clinical RecurrenceJournal of Urology, 1988
- Prognostic Factors in Localized Prostatic CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1985
- The Accuracy of Diagnostic Biopsy Specimens in Predicting Tumor Grades by Gleason’s Classification of Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, 1984
- Understaging and undergrading of prostate cancer Argument for postoperative radiation as adjuvant therapyUrology, 1983
- Relationship Between Grade and Stage of adenocarcinoma of the Prostate and Regional Pelvic Lymph Node MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1982
- Prognostic significance of nucleolar surface area in prostate cancerUrology, 1982
- Grading Errors in Prostatic Needle Biopsies: Relation to the Accuracy of Tumor Grade in Predicting Pelvic Lymph Node MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1982
- Experience with Gleason’s Histopathologic Grading in Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1980