The Directed Mutation Controversy and Neo-Darwinism
- 8 January 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 259 (5092), 188-194
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7678468
Abstract
According to neo-Darwinian theory, random mutation produces genetic differences among organisms whereas natural selection tends to increase the frequency of advantageous alleles. However, several recent papers claim that certain mutations in bacteria and yeast occur at much higher rates specifically when the mutant phenotypes are advantageous. Various molecular models have been proposed that might explain these directed mutations, but the models have not been confirmed. Critics contend that studies purporting to demonstrate directed mutation lack certain controls and fail to account adequately for population dynamics. Further experiments that address these criticisms do not support the existence of directed mutations.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental evidence for an alternative to directed mutation in thebgl operonNature, 1992
- SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONAnnual Review of Genetics, 1991
- Mechanism for induction of adaptive mutations in Escherichia coliMolecular Microbiology, 1990
- New data on excisions of Mu from E. coli MCS2 cast doubt on directed mutation hypothesisNature, 1990
- Reverse Transcriptase in a Clinical Strain of Escherichia coli : Production of Branched RNA-Linked msDNAScience, 1989
- Selection, adaptation, and bacterial operonsGenome, 1989
- Origin of mutants disputedNature, 1988
- A comparison of selective methods and a test of the pre-adaptation hypothesisHeredity, 1960
- Bacterial Mutation in a Stationary Phase and the Question of Cell TurnoverJournal of General Microbiology, 1959
- Adaptation to use Lactose in Escherichia ColiJournal of General Microbiology, 1952