Pharmacokinetic interactions of efavirenz and voriconazole in healthy volunteers
Open Access
- 20 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 65 (4), 523-530
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03085.x
Abstract
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Efavirenz 400 mg q24 h reduces exposure to voriconazole 200 mg q12 h when the two drugs are co-administered. • Furthermore, voriconazole increases the systemic exposure of efavirenz. • Co-administration was therefore initially contraindicated. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • The doses of efavirenz and voriconazole can be adjusted to provide adequate exposure to both drugs when the two are co-administered, without compromising safety. • Appropriate adjustment of doses for both drugs may thus represent an alternative to a mere contraindication. AIMS Co-administration of standard-dose voriconazole and efavirenz results in a substantial decrease in voriconazole levels, while concurrently increasing efavirenz levels. Hence, concomitant use of standard doses of these drugs was initially contraindicated. This study assessed different dose combinations of efavirenz and voriconazole, with the goal of attaining a dose combination that provides systemic exposures similar to standard-dose monotherapy with each drug. METHODS This was an open-label, four-treatment, multiple-dose, fixed-sequence study in 16 healthy males. Steady-state pharmacokinetics were assessed following two test treatments (voriconazole 300 mg q12 h + efavirenz 300 mg q24 h and voriconazole 400 mg q12 h + efavirenz 300 mg q24 h) and compared with standard-dose monotherapy (voriconazole 200 mg q12 h or efavirenz 600 mg q24 h). RESULTS Dose adjustment to voriconazole 300 mg q12 h with efavirenz 300 mg q24 h decreased voriconazole area under the concentration–time curve (AUCτ) and maximum concentration (Cmax), with changes of −55% [90% confidence interval (CI) −62, −45] and −36% (90% CI −49, −21), respectively, when compared with monotherapy. Voriconazole 400 mg q12 h plus efavirenz 300 mg q24 h decreased voriconazole AUCτ (−7%; 90% CI −23, 13) and increased Cmax (23%; 90% CI −1, 53), while increasing efavirenz AUCτ (17%; 90% CI 6, 29) and not changing Cmax when compared with the respective monotherapy regimens. No serious adverse events were observed with voriconazole plus efavirenz. CONCLUSIONS When co-administered, voriconazole dose should be increased to 400 mg q12 h and efavirenz dose decreased to 300 mg q24 h in order to provide systemic exposures similar to standard-dose monotherapy.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Breakthrough Candida Infections in Patients Receiving VoriconazoleAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 2005
- Variations of CYP3A activity induced by antiretroviral treatment in HIV-1 infected patientsEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2005
- Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole and cytochrome p450 2C19 genetic statusClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2004
- Coadministration of voriconazole and phenytoin: pharmacokinetic interaction, safety, and tolerationBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2003
- Voriconazole versus Amphotericin B for Primary Therapy of Invasive AspergillosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Hepatic but not intestinal CYP3A4 displays dose‐dependent induction by efavirenz in humansClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2002
- A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Multicenter Trial of Voriconazole and Fluconazole in the Treatment of Esophageal Candidiasis in Immunocompromised PatientsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase InhibitorsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2001
- How Appropriate Are Popular Sample Size Formulas?The American Statistician, 1989