No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study
Open Access
- 1 July 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal Of Cancer
- Vol. 116, 169-177
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Regional Cancer Centre of Western Sweden
- Swedish Cancer Society (CAN2017/594)
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysisGynecologic Oncology, 2015
- Oncological outcome and long‐term complications in robot‐assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2014
- Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancerCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012
- Recurrence and Survival After Random Assignment to Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A 3-year experienceGynecologic Oncology, 2010
- The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register – a sample survey for year 1998Acta Oncologica, 2009
- A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- Classification of radical hysterectomyThe Lancet Oncology, 2008
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958