Whistling in the Dark: Exaggerated Consensus Estimates in Response to Incidental Reminders of Mortality
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 7 (6), 332-336
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00384.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing alternative explanations for mortality salience effects: Terror management, value accessibility, or worrisome thoughts?European Journal of Social Psychology, 1995
- Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one's worldview?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992
- Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990
- Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effectJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1989
- Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review.Psychological Bulletin, 1987
- Toward an Integration of Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives on Social Inference: A Biased Hypothesis-Testing ModelPublished by Elsevier ,1987
- The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management TheoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis testsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1985
- A Theory of Social Comparison ProcessesHuman Relations, 1954