Monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health: an international perspective
Open Access
- 14 April 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Human Resources for Health
- Vol. 1 (1), 3
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-1-3
Abstract
Despite the undoubted importance of human resources to the functions of health systems, there is little consistency between countries in how human resource strategies are monitored and evaluated. This paper presents an integrated approach for developing an evidence base on human resources for health (HRH) to support decision-making, drawing on a framework for health systems performance assessment. Conceptual and methodological issues for selecting indicators for HRH monitoring and evaluation are discussed, and a range of primary and secondary data sources that might be used to generate indicators are reviewed. Descriptive analyses are conducted drawing primarily on one type of source, namely routinely reported data on the numbers of health personnel and medical schools as covered by national reporting systems and compiled by the World Health Organization. Regression techniques are used to triangulate a given HRH indicator calculated from different data sources across multiple countries. Major variations in the supply of health personnel and training opportunities are found to occur by region. However, certain discrepancies are also observed in measuring the same indicator from different sources, possibly related to the occupational classification or to the sources' representation. Evidence-based information is needed to better understand trends in HRH. Although a range of sources exist that can potentially be used for HRH assessment, the information that can be derived from many of these individual sources precludes refined analysis. A variety of data sources and analytical approaches, each with its own strengths and limitations, is required to reflect the complexity of HRH issues. In order to enhance cross-national comparability, data collection efforts should be processed through the use of internationally standardized classifications (in particular, for occupation, industry and education) at the greatest level of detail possible.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Keeping nurses at work: a duration analysisHealth Economics, 2002
- The NHS Plan: nurse satisfaction, commitment and retention strategiesHealth Services Management Research, 2002
- Measuring the efficiency of health systemsBMJ, 2001
- Considerations on methodology used in the World Health Organization 2000 ReportCadernos de Saude Publica, 2001
- Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000The Lancet, 2001
- Increasingly inequitable distribution of general practitioners in Australia, 1986–96Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2001
- Health systems: more evidence, more debate.2000
- International comparison of health care systems using resource profiles.2000
- Identifying the population of health managers in one Canadian province: A two-stage approachEvaluation and Program Planning, 1996
- Gender comparisons of young physiciansʼ perceptions of their medical education, professional life, and practiceAcademic Medicine, 1995