NEORAL MONITORING BY SIMPLIFIED SPARSE SAMPLING AREA UNDER THE CONCENTRATION-TIME CURVE
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 68 (1), 55-62
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199907150-00011
Abstract
Cyclosporine (CsA) dosing is traditionally based on trough blood levels (C0) rather than area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), although AUC correlates better with posttransplantation clinical events. For Neoral, AUC based on limited sampling correlates closely with full 12-hr AUC. The purpose of our study was to correlate C0 with AUC based on CsA levels at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hr after dose (PK0-4) and to compare this AUC with C0 in predicting acute rejection (AR) and acute cyclosporine nephrotoxicity (CsANT) in de novo first kidney transplant patients. PK0-4 was done 2-4 days after starting Neoral for 156 patients. All received CsA-based triple-drug immunosuppression without antibody induction. AUC was calculated as projected 12-hr (AUC0-12) and actual 4-hr (AUC0-4) from the PK0-4 using the parallel trapezoid rule. Neoral dosing was based on C0 not AUC. AUC was retrospectively compared with C0 as a predictor of AR and CsANT during the first 90 days. C0 correlated poorly with AUC0-12 and AUC0-4 (r=0.61 and r=0.42). C0 (mean+/-SEM) levels were not significantly different in 34 patients with and 109 without AR (293+/-21 vs. 294+/-11 microg/L, P=0.95). AUC0-12 and AUC0-4 were significantly lower in patients with than without AR (AUC0-12 9090+/-598 vs. 10608+/-336 microg x h/L, P=0.01; AUC0-4 3934+/-306 vs. 4802+/-166 microg.h/L, P=0.006). In stepwise regression analysis only AUC0-12 or AUC0-4 (P=0.03/P=0.02) and delayed graft function (P=0.007) predicted AR. AUC0-12, AUC0-4, and C0 were all significantly higher in patients with CsANT than without CsANT (AUC0-12 11746+/-650 vs. 10023+/-301 microg x h/L, P=0.01; AUC0-4 5270+/-358 vs. 4474+/-150 microg x h/L, P=0.01; C0 343+/-18 vs. 287+/-10 microg/L, P=0.01), but in stepwise regression analysis C0 was not an independent predictor of CsANT. Patients with AUC0-12 in the range of 9500 to 11500 microg x h/L or AUC0-4 between 4400 and 5500 microg x h/L had the lowest incidence of AR (13% and 7%, respectively) without significantly higher risk for CsANT. C0 correlates poorly with AUC based on PK0-4. Early AUC based on PK0-4 is more closely associated with AR and CsANT than is C0. Our data suggest that a target AUC0-12 of 9500-11500 or AUC0-4 of 4400-5500 microg x h/L may provide optimal Neoral immunosuppression.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoral vs sandimmun in de novo renal transplant patients over 24 months' treatmentTransplantation Proceedings, 1997
- Neoral vs sandimmun: Interim results of a randomized trial of efficacy and safety in preventing acute rejection in new renal transplant recipientsTransplantation Proceedings, 1997
- A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF CYCLOSPORINE MICROEMULSION IN STABLE RENAL GRAFT RECIPIENTS1,2,3Transplantation, 1996
- Clinical Development of a Cyclosporine Microemulsion in TransplantationTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1996
- THE SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF CYCLOSPORINE EMULSION VERSUS CYCLOSPORINE IN A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON IN PRIMARY RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS1Transplantation, 1996
- THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF A MICROEMULSION FORMULATION OF CYCLOSPORINE IN PRIMARY RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS1Transplantation, 1996
- Lake Louise Consensus Conference on Cyclosporin Monitoring in Organ Transplantation: Report of the Consensus PanelTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1995
- Influence of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics, trough concentrations, and AUC monitoring on outcome after kidney transplantationClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1993
- Cyclosporine Monitoring in Renal TransplantationTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1989
- THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CYCLOSPORINE PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS AND SUBSEQUENT ACUTE REJECTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1988