Insurance status and race represent independent predictors of undergoing laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis: Secondary data analysis of 145,546 patients
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 199 (4), 567-575
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.06.023
Abstract
Studies have shown that racial and socioeconomic differences lead to inequality in access to health care. It is unknown whether insurance status and race affect the choice of surgical treatment for patients presenting with appendicitis. Patients with primary ICD-9 procedure codes for laparoscopic and open appendectomy were selected from the 1998, 1999, and 2000 Nationwide (US) Inpatient Samples. The primary predictor variables were insurance status (private, Medicare, Medicaid, other) and race (Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, other). Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess whether insurance status and race are associated with the choice of surgical procedure for patients presenting with appendicitis. Discharge abstracts of 145,546 patients were used for our analyses. There were 32,407 patients (22.3%) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 113,139 patients (77.7%) who had open appendectomy. Although 24.2% of privately insured patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, only 16.9% of Medicare patients, 17.4% of Medicaid patients, and 19.6% of patients in the "other" insurance category were treated using the laparoscopic procedure (p < 0.001). Caucasian patients underwent laparoscopic surgery in 24.8%, African Americans in 18.6%, Hispanics in 19.6%, and other ethnicities in 18.8% of patients (p < 0.001). Compared with the Medicaid subset, and after adjusting for potential confounders such as age, gender, race, patient comorbidity, median ZIP code income, hospital location and teaching status, and presence of abscess or perforation, privately insured patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% [CI [1.20, 1.33], p < 0.001) and Medicare patients (OR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.05, 1.30], p = 0.004) were significantly more likely to undergo laparoscopic surgery. Caucasian patients (OR = 1.42, 95% CI [1.33, 1.51], p < 0.001) and Hispanics (OR = 1.12, 95% CI [1.04, 1.20], p = 0.002) were significantly more likely to have laparoscopic appendectomy, compared with African Americans, even after adjusting for the previously mentioned confounders and insurance status. Even after adjusting for potential confounders, insurance status and race are marked independent predictors of having laparoscopic surgery in patients treated for appendicitis in this sample.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Versus Open AppendectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Prediction of survival and opportunistic infections in HIV‐infected patients: a comparison of imputation methods of incomplete CD4 countsStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Mortality After Appendectomy in Sweden, 1987–1996Annals of Surgery, 2001
- R: A Language for Data Analysis and GraphicsJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 1996
- A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic AppendectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Laparoscopic Versus Conventional AppendectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Racial inequalities in the use of procedures for patients with ischemic heart disease in MassachusettsJAMA, 1989
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987