Sequential therapy vs. standard triple therapies forHelicobacter pyloriinfection: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: As standard triple therapies of achieve unsatisfactory eradication of Helicobacter pylori, several alternative regimens have been proposed. Objectives: To systematically evaluate whether sequential treatment eradicates H. pylori infection better than standard triple therapies and compare the risk of adverse events with these two regimens. Methods: We searched electronic databases up to February 2008 for studies evaluating the efficacy of the 10‐day sequential therapy vs. standard triple regimens for eradication of H. pylori. The pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Results: We identified 11 randomized trials, including eight full‐text manuscripts and three abstracts. Pooled analysis demonstrated clear superiority of the sequential therapy over 7‐day triple regimen with an RR of 1·23 (95% CI 1·19–1·27), and over 10‐day triple regimen with a RR of 1·16 (95% CI 1·10–1·23). Adverse event rates were similar. For sequential therapy vs. 7‐day triple therapies, RR = 0·96, 95% CI 0·70–1·31. Conclusions: Sequential therapy was associated with a higher eradication rate of H. pylori compared with both 7‐day triple regimen and 10‐day triple regimen.