Testing the Reliability of Genetic Methods of Species Identification via Simulation
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Systematic Biology
- Vol. 57 (2), 216-230
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150802032990
Abstract
Although genetic methods of species identification, especially DNA barcoding, are strongly debated, tests of these methods have been restricted to a few empirical cases for pragmatic reasons. Here we use simulation to test the performance of methods based on sequence comparison (BLAST and genetic distance) and tree topology over a wide range of evolutionary scenarios. Sequences were simulated on a range of gene trees spanning almost three orders of magnitude in tree depth and in coalescent depth; that is, deep or shallow trees with deep or shallow coalescences. When the query's conspecific sequences were included in the reference alignment, the rate of positive identification was related to the degree to which different species were genetically differentiated. The BLAST, distance, and liberal tree-based methods returned higher rates of correct identification than did the strict tree-based requirement that the query was within, but not sister to, a single-species clade. Under this more conservative approach, ambiguous outcomes occurred in inverse proportion to the number of reference sequences per species. When the query's conspecific sequences were not in the reference alignment, only the strict tree-based approach was relatively immune to making false-positive identifications. Thresholds affected the rates at which false-positive identifications were made when the query's species was unrepresented in the reference alignment but did not otherwise influence outcomes. A conservative approach using the strict tree-based method should be used initially in large-scale identification systems, with effort made to maximize sequence sampling within species. Once the genetic variation within a taxonomic group is well characterized and the taxonomy resolved, then the choice of method used should be dictated by considerations of computational efficiency. The requirement for extensive genetic sampling may render these techniques inappropriate in some circumstances.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genusProtocalliphora(Diptera: Calliphoridae)Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org)Molecular Ecology Notes, 2007
- Using phylogenetic analyses and reference datasets to validate the species identities of cetacean sequences in GenBankMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2006
- Beyond barcodes: complex DNA taxonomy of a South Pacific Island radiationProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- DNA Barcoding: Error Rates Based on Comprehensive SamplingPLoS Biology, 2005
- A likelihood ratio test for species membership based on DNA sequence dataPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005
- DNA Barcoding: Promise and PitfallsPLoS Biology, 2004
- Identification of Birds through DNA BarcodesPLoS Biology, 2004
- Biological identifications through DNA barcodesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- Sequence search algorithms for single pass sequence identification: does one size fit all?Comparative and Functional Genomics, 2001