Effects of two different rearing systems (organic and barn) on production performance, animal welfare traits and egg quality characteristics in laying hens
Open Access
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Italian Journal of Animal Science
- Vol. 8 (2), 165-174
- https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.165
Abstract
Alternative housing systems for hen eggs production represents clear evidence of the trend in animal housing and husbandry towards extensive rearing methods. Consumer demand is oriented towards healthy foods controlled not only under a safety point of view, but also under a welfare assessment of the animals’ living conditions. Among the different alternative systems deep litter and organic production in recent years have been improved in Italy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether different housing systems (barn B and organic O) for laying hens may influence productive performance, fear responses and egg quality characteristics. A total of 4,745 birds were housed in the B system and 2,016 in the O system, both of which were commercial facilities. In each system the same strain (Hy-Line Brown) was housed and layer performance, external and internal egg characteristics, mortality and feed consumption were recorded weekly. Animal reactivity was recorded monthly with the approaching test. Moreover, the Tonic Immobility test was conducted at 70 weeks of age; feather and foot pad conditions were also investigated at the same time. The peak of laying was reached in both housing systems at 25 weeks of age and was higher in organic hens (94.5%) than in barn hens (93.0%). Feed conversion rate during the overall laying period was 2.36 vs 2.20, respectively, in O and B housing systems. There was a significant difference concerning the eggs classified as very dirty, dirty and cracked between the two systems. The dirty eggs were higher in O system probably due to laying eggs in a free range area, while the higher number of cracked eggs in B system may be due to a significantly less shell thickness in this system. Egg weight increased with layer age in both housing systems. Animals reared in O system showed less fearfulness than in B emphasised by the approaching and Tonic Immobility test results. Feather scoring did not evidence any severe plumage damage; statistical analysis showed some significant differences in comb and back areas between O and B systems. The hens reared on litter showed more aggressive pecking than the organic hens probably due to difference both in light intensity and in densityKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2003 Spring meeting of the WPSA French BranchBritish Poultry Science, 2003
- Direct selection for improvement of animal well-being.Published by CABI Publishing ,2003
- Indirect selection for improvement of animal well-being.Published by CABI Publishing ,2003
- Behaviour problems associated with selection for increased production.Published by CABI Publishing ,2003
- Effect of Two Floor Housing Systems and Cages on Health, Production, and Fear Response in LayersJournal of Applied Poultry Research, 1999
- Prevalence and control of foot-pad dermatitis in broilers in SwedenBritish Poultry Science, 1998
- Effect of Feather Coverage and Temperature on Layer PerformancePoultry Science, 1993
- Shell strength of eggs from medium‐bodied hybrid hens housed in cages or on range in outside pensBritish Poultry Science, 1984
- Effects of Cage Design and Bird Density on LayersPoultry Science, 1982
- The influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowlsBritish Poultry Science, 1972