Hospital and community health service costs: England and Scotland compared.
- 19 September 1987
- Vol. 295 (6600), 707-710
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.295.6600.707
Abstract
In publications which have compared the health expenditure in the component parts of the United Kingdom by applying the Resource Allocation Working Party (RAWP) formula to the health budget of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland it has been previously concluded that Scotland's hospital and community health services expenditure is more than 19% above what would be a fair distribution. It has also been implied that Scotland's allocation should be cut substantially to improve services in England. On the assumption that the purpose of examining the distribution of the health and community health service budget is to ensure "equal opportunity of access to health care for people at equal risk" it is concluded that simple RAWPing of the United Kingdom budget is flawed and a conclusion based on this is therefore untenable.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE RAWP REVIEW: PIOUS HOPESThe Lancet, 1986
- APPLYING RESOURCE ALLOCATION FORMULÆ TO CONSTITUENT PARTS OF THE U.K.The Lancet, 1980
- Scottish Health Authorities Revenue EqualisationScottish Medical Journal, 1978
- Technical deficiencies in RAWPBMJ, 1977
- MORTALITY, MORBIDITY, AND RESOURCE ALLOCATIONThe Lancet, 1977