Short-term Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy for Colon CancerA Randomized Trial
Top Cited Papers
- 16 January 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 287 (3), 321-328
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.3.321
Abstract
Research from JAMA — Short-term Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer — A Randomized Trial — ContextLaparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) has emerged as the preferred minimally invasive surgical strategy for diseases of the colon. The safety and efficacy of LAC for colon cancer are unknown, and the nature and magnitude of any quality-of-life (QOL) benefit resulting from LAC for colon cancer is also unknown.ObjectiveTo compare short-term QOL outcomes after LAC vs open colectomy for colon cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsMulticenter, randomized controlled trial (Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy [COST]). Between September 1994 and February 1999, 37 of 48 centers provided data for the QOL component of the trial for 449 consecutive patients with clinically resectable colon cancer.Main Outcome MeasuresScores on the Symptoms Distress Scale (SDS), Quality of Life Index, and a single-item global rating scale at 2 days, 2 weeks, and 2 months postoperative; duration of postoperative in-hospital analgesic use; and length of stay.ResultsOf 449 patients, 428 provided QOL data. In an intention-to-treat analysis comparing SDS pain intensity, SDS summary, QOL Index summary, and global rating scale scores at each time point, the only statistically significant difference observed between groups was the global rating scale score for 2 weeks postsurgery. The mean (median) global rating scale scores for 2 weeks postsurgery were 76.9 (80) for LAC vs 74.4 (75) for open colectomy (P = .009). While in the hospital, patients assigned to LAC required fewer days of both parenteral analgesics compared with patients assigned to open colectomy (mean [median], 3.2 [3] vs 4.0 [4] days; P<.001) and oral analgesics (mean [median], 1.9 [1] vs 2.2 [2] days; P = .03).ConclusionOnly minimal short-term QOL benefits were found with LAC for colon cancer compared with standard open colectomy. Until ongoing trials establish that LAC is as effective as open colectomy in preventing recurrence and death from colon cancer, this procedure should not be offered to patients with colon cancer.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: Trial updateJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1998
- Externalities in hospitals and physician adoption of a new surgical technology: An exploratory analysisJournal of Health Economics, 1996
- Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study GroupEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 1996
- Diffusion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Among General Surgeons in the United StatesMedical Care, 1995
- Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomyThe Lancet, 1994
- Surgical Rates and Operative Mortality for Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in MarylandNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patientsThe Lancet, 1992
- Assessing quality of life and preferences in the seriously ill using utility theoryJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- Symptom distress, current concerns and mood disturbance after diagnosis of life-threatening diseaseSocial Science & Medicine, 1983
- The ASA Classification of Physical Status–A RecapitulationAnesthesiology, 1978