Food Interactions with Sustained-Release Theophylline Preparations1
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Clinical Pharmacokinetics
- Vol. 16 (3), 162-179
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-198916030-00003
Abstract
Currently, theophylline is being used predominantly as sustained-release capsules or tablets. In the mid-seventies the first preparations for use with a dosage interval of 12 hours (twice-daily preparations) were introduced. Since 1983, theophylline preparations that can be given with an interval of 24 hours (once-daily preparations) have become available. The release of theophylline from some of these products can be influenced (either increased or decreased) by concomitant intake of food. With some preparations the composition of the meal (especially the fat content) has an influence on the degree of effect. The consequence may be an effect on the rate of absorption or on the amount absorbed, or both simultaneously. This could result in an unexpected shift of the plasma theophylline concentration. Such a shift is therapeutically undesirable, because theophylline has a fairly narrow therapeutic range. A review is given of those food interactions with the sustained-release theophylline preparations, both twice-daily and once-daily products, that are currently on the world market. Special attention is paid to the specific (bio)pharmaceutical characteristics of the different products, and to the influence of the composition and timing of the meals. For each preparation the effect of food on the following pharmacokinetic parameters is discussed: area under the plasma concentration-time curve, peak plasma drug concentration and time to reach this peak. Where possible, the results for both adults and children are discussed. There are indications that children are more susceptible to food-effects than adults. The regulatory aspects are mentioned briefly. Clinically important effects of food have been observed with the following twice-daily products: ‘Theo-Dur Sprinkle’, ‘Theolair SR’ (= ‘Nuelin SR’) and ‘Theograd’. Pronounced effects could have an even greater impact with once-daily preparations, as the total daily dose will be given at a single time. A particularly sudden release of a major part of the dose (‘dose-dumping’) may result in toxic plasma concentrations. Among these products, clinically important effects in children have been reported with ‘Theo-24’ and ‘Uniphyl’.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Absorption characteristics of once-a-day slow-release theophylline preparation in children with asthmaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1987
- Advantages and disadvantages of 24-hour theophyllineJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1985
- Theophylline Pooled Michaelis-Menten Parameters (Vmax and Km) and ImplicationsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1985
- A Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Basis for the Selection and Use of Slow Release Theophylline ProductsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1984
- In vitro testing of controlled release theophylline preparations: Theolair ®, Theograd® and Theolin®International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 1983
- Effect of Food on the Bioavailability and Pattern of Release of a Sustained‐Release Theophylline TabletThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1982
- Interaction Between Nutrition and Theophylline Metabolism in ChildrenTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1982
- Absorption characteristics of sustained release theophylline capsules administered in applesauceThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1981
- Influence of Food on the Bioavailability of DrugsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1978
- Influence of food and diet on gastrointestinal drug absorption: A reviewJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1977