The Use of a Rapid D-dimer Blood Test in the Diagnostic Workup for Pulmonary Embolism: A Management Study
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Vol. 82 (12), 1588-1592
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1614883
Abstract
Background. D-dimer assays have a potential to rule out pulmonary embolism in case of a normal test result. We studied the clinical utility of incorporating the SimpliRED D-dimer test result and clinical probability in the routine diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Methods. In a prospective management study 245 consecutive patients, hospitalised as well as outpatients, were included. A SimpliRED D-dimer test and perfusion/(ventilation) scintigraphy were obtained in all patients, whereas clinical probability was determined in the subgroup of patients with a non-diagnostic scan and normal D-dimer result. A diagnostic algorithm determined the necessity for further testing and decisions about treatment. All patients were followed up for 3 months. Results. In 54 patients (22%) with a normal lung scan and 50 patients (21%) with a high probability lung scan, antithrombotic therapy was withheld or started respectively, irrespective of the D-dimer result. A non-diagnostic lung scan was found in 137 (56%) patients, of whom 70 patients had an abnormal D-dimer test, in whom further testing was ordered. Of the remaining 67 patients with a non-diagnostic lung scan and normal D-dimer test 8 patients had a high clinical probability, and the subsequent ultrasonography and pulmonary angiography yielded pulmonary emboli in 1 patient. In the remaining 66 patients, pulmonary embolism was considered to be absent and antithrombotic treatment was stopped/withheld. During follow-up of these patients only one patient experienced a possible venous thromboembolic event (failure rate 1,5% ; 95% CI 0-8%). The SimpliRED D-dimer was normal in 6 of 61 patients with proven pulmonary embolism (sensitivity 90% ; 95% CI 80-96%). Conclusion. Our findings suggest that it is safe to withhold anticoagulant therapy in those patients with a non-diagnostic lung scan, a normal SimpliRED D-dimer test result, and without a high clinical probability. This results in a substantial decreased need for ultrasonography and pulmonary angiography. The SimpliRED should not be used in isolation to exclude pulmonary embolism.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatientsThe Lancet, 1999
- Sensitivity and Specificity of a Rapid Whole-Blood Assay for D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary EmbolismAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Trends in the Incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary EmbolismArchives of Internal Medicine, 1998
- A survey of the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the NetherlandsThe Netherlands Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Diagnostic Utility of Ultrasonography of Leg Veins in Patients Suspected of Having Pulmonary EmbolismAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Feasibility, safety and clinical utility of angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolismEuropean Radiology, 1996
- The role of plasma D‐dimer concentration in the exclusion of pulmonary embolismBritish Journal of Haematology, 1996
- The simpliRED D dimer test: A novel assay for the detection of crosslinked fibrin degradation products in whole bloodThrombosis Research, 1990
- Clinical Validity of a Normal Perfusion Lung Scan in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismChest, 1990
- Pulmonary Angiography, Ventilation Lung Scanning, and Venography for Clinically Suspected Pulmonary Embolism with Abnormal Perfusion Lung ScanAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983