IMMUNOPROPHYLAXIS WITH A MONOCLONAL ANTI-IL-2 RECEPTOR ANTIBODY IN LIVER TRANSPLANT PATIENTS1
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 61 (4), 546-554
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199602270-00006
Abstract
The immunosuppressive effect of a monoclonal antibody (moAb), BT563, directed to the alpha-chain of the IL-2R (CD25), was analyzed in a prospective nonrandomized trial and a prospective randomized trial. Primary objectives were evaluation of the incidence of acute rejections and infections; secondary objectives were safety and tolerability of the moAb. A total of 28 patients were enrolled (phase II) to receive 10 mg/day of BT563 (12 days) as immunoprophylaxis in combination with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and low-dose steroids. Subsequently 32 patients were randomly assigned (phase III) to receive BT563 (10 mg/day) for 12 days or ATG (5 mg/kg/day) for 7 days in addition to cyclosporine and low-dose steroids. No side effects of the BT563 treatment were noted. The actuarial survival was 82% at 12 months in the phase II trial and 92% at 12 months in both arms of the phase III trial. There was one acute rejection in the phase II trial. No acute rejections were noted in the BT arm of the phase III trial and 5 acute rejections were treated in the ATG arm. In the phase II trial 7 infectious episodes were observed, while one infection was seen in the BT arm and 7 in the ATG arm of the triple immunosuppression phase III trial. In all patients circulation of coated CD25+ lymphocytes was observed during BT563 treatment; there was no evidence of depletion or modulation of CD25+ cells. Mean serum levels of BT563 ranged from 1.6 to 7.6 microgram/ml throughout the therapy. An antimurine response was seen in 82% (phase II) and 100% (phase III) of the patients. Antirabbit antibodies were found in 56% of the patients treated with ATG. Analysis of the antimurine response specificity revealed in 56% blocking anti-isotypic antibodies and only in 3% of the patients an anti-idiotypic response. The data of the study presented suggest that therapy with an anti IL-2R moAb is at least equal to ATG application according to the incidence of acute rejections and infections.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interleukin-2 Receptor γ Chain: a Functional Component of the Interleukin-4 ReceptorScience, 1993
- MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES IN PROPHYLACTIC IMMUNOSUPPRESSION AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING OKT3 AND ANTI-IL-2 RECEPTOR MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY LO-TACT-1Transplantation, 1993
- The synergy between naive and memory T cells during activationImmunology Today, 1991
- Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder and OKT3New England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Randomized Controlled Trial of a Monoclonal Antibody against the Interleukin-2 Receptor (33B3.1) as Compared with Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin for Prophylaxis against Rejection of Renal AllograftsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Systemic Reaction to the Anti–T-Cell Monoclonal Antibody OKT3 in Relation to Serum Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor and Interferon-αNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- A Randomized Clinical Trial of OKT3 Monoclonal Antibody for Acute Rejection of Cadaveric Renal TransplantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- EVOLVING USE OF OKT3 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY FOR TREATMENT OF RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTIONTransplantation, 1984
- Human in vivo antigenic modulation induced by the anti‐T cell OKT3 monoclonal antibodyEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1982
- Use of Monoclonal Antibodies to T-Cell Subsets for Immunologic Monitoring and Treatment in Recipients of Renal AllograftsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981