Can Group Self-Management Mean a Loss of Personal Control: Triangulating a Paradox
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Group & Organization Studies
- Vol. 11 (4), 309-334
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0364108286114002
Abstract
This study focuses on the implications of introducing self-managed work groups in a context that has traditionally relied on individual self-management-an independent property and casualty insurance firm. A multimethod approach was employed in order to triangulate on a paradoxical situation in which establishment of self-managed work groups can threaten the personal control and autonomy of individual organization members.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Searching for the “Unleader”: Organizational Member Views on Leading Self-Managed GroupsHuman Relations, 1984
- Research Notes. THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SELF-SUPERVISION, STRUCTURE, AND TECHNOLOGY IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1982
- A Typology for Integrating Technology, Organization, and Job DesignHuman Relations, 1980
- Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in ActionAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1979
- Behavioral self-management—The missing link in managerial effectivenessOrganizational Dynamics, 1979
- The self system in reciprocal determinism.American Psychologist, 1978
- Work Innovations at Topeka: After Six YearsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1977
- An Experiment in Autonomous Working in an American Underground Coal MineHuman Relations, 1977
- A Theory of Social Comparison ProcessesHuman Relations, 1954
- Value and need as organizing factors in perception.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1947