The Quality of Care and the Quality of Measuring It
- 21 October 1993
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 329 (17), 1263-1265
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199310213291710
Abstract
Underlying the expectation that physicians, health plans, and other organizations will soon be competing on the basis of the quality as well as the cost of medical care1 is the fundamental assumption that we know what quality is and how to measure it, monitor it, and ensure it. This is a proposition devoutly to be wished, and one to which millions of dollars will be devoted. But how accurate is it?A large industry is developing standards of quality against which physicians and health care organizations will be judged. These standards, or practice guidelines, are based on existing controlled clinical . . .Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changing Physicians' PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- What Physicians KnowNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The Methodologic Foundations of Studies of the Appropriateness of Medical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Maintaining hospital quality. The need for international cooperationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- The appropriateness of use of coronary angiography in New York StatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- The Outcomes Movement — Will It Get Us Where We Want to Go?New England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Practice Guidelines and Standards: An OverviewQRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1990
- The Appropriateness of Carotid EndarterectomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures.American Journal of Public Health, 1986
- A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1986