Vaccines for Children Program, United States, 1997
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 104 (2), e15
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.104.2.e15
Abstract
Objectives.: 1) To determine the proportion of preschool children receiving immunizations from providers enrolled in the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program; 2) to assess whether their immunization providers serve as their medical home for primary care; and 3) to examine the relationship between various provider characteristics and immunization status. Design. : Two-phase national survey consisting of parent interviews verified by provider record check. Setting.: A total of 78 survey areas (50 states, the District of Columbia, and 27 urban areas). Patients or Other Participants.: Noninstitutionalized children from 19 to 35 months of age in 1997. Interventions.: None. Outcome Measures.: VFC penetration rate (the percentage of children who received all or some vaccines from a VFC-enrolled provider); the frequency with which children received all or some vaccines within a medical home; the number of parent-reported immunization providers; and 4:3:1:3 up-to-date status at 19 to 35 months of age. Results.: Of 28 298 children interviewed for whom consent to contact providers was obtained, complete provider data were available for 21 522 (76%). Of these children, ∼75% received all or some immunizations from a VFC-enrolled provider, 73% received all or some immunizations within a medical home, and 75% had one immunization provider. Children received all or some immunizations from a VFC-enrolled provider more frequently when vaccinated by pediatricians versus family physicians or in public facilities versus private practice. After controlling for poverty, immunization coverage varied only slightly with receipt of vaccines from a VFC-enrolled provider, receipt of vaccines within a medical home, and the number of parent-reported providers. Among children vaccinated within a medical home, those vaccinated solely by pediatricians were 1.63 times as likely to be 4:3:1:3 up-to-date than were those vaccinated solely by family physicians after removing the effects of poverty. Recommendations.: Greater numbers of children are likely to benefit from an even higher participation rate among immunization providers in the VFC program, particularly among family physicians and private physicians. The public–private collaboration developed by the VFC program should be capitalized on so that public sector resources can help pediatricians and family physicians practice according to theStandards for Pediatric Immunization Practices.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Immunization Performance of Private Practitioners in Maine: Impact of the Assessment, Feedback, Incentives, and Exchange StrategyPediatrics, 1999
- A Randomized Study of Tracking With Outreach and Provider Prompting to Improve Immunization Coverage and Primary CarePediatrics, 1999
- Evidence on Office-Based Interventions to Improve Childhood Immunization DeliveryPediatric Annals, 1998
- Factors associated with unnecessary immunization given to childrenThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1997
- Inappropriately timed immunizations: types, causes, and their relationship to record keeping.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- Influence of Family Functioning and Income on Vaccination in Inner-city Health CentersArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1996
- What Mothers Say About Why Poor Children Fall Behind on ImmunizationsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1995
- Five‐Hundred Life‐Saving Interventions and Their Cost‐EffectivenessRisk Analysis, 1995
- Is Underimmunization a Marker for Insufficient Utilization of Preventive and Primary Care?Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1995
- The Measles EpidemicJAMA, 1991