Psychiatric Classification and Empiricist Theories of Meaning
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Vol. 88 (S373), 48-64
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb05614.x
Abstract
The philosophical background of the contemporary debate over psychiatric classification is reviewed in some detail. It is shown that the philosophy behind DSM-III and DSM-III-R is based on a theory about the semantic status of operational definitions, which was abandoned several decades ago by empiricist philosophers of science. It is argued that the newer empiricist and realist theories of meaning developed after 1960, particularly the idea of an indirect specification of meaning through contingent operational criteria, offer a better foundation for psychiatric classification.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Realism, Empiricism and Scientific RevolutionsPhilosophy of Science, 1991
- What Realism Implies and What it Does NotDialectica, 1989
- The empiricist and his new clothes: DSM-III in perspectiveAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1986
- Logical empiricism and psychiatric classificationComprehensive Psychiatry, 1986
- The Rationality of SciencePublished by Taylor & Francis ,1981
- Specific Etiology and Other Forms of Strong Influence: Some Quantitative MeaningsJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1977
- How to Define Theoretical TermsThe Journal of Philosophy, 1970
- THEORETICAL TERMS AND PARTIAL INTERPRETATIONThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1963
- Definition and Specification of MeaningThe Journal of Philosophy, 1946
- Testability and MeaningPhilosophy of Science, 1936