Effects of Inbreeding, Selection, Linecrossing and Topcrossing in Swine. III. Predicting Combining Ability and General Conclusions
- 30 April 1958
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Animal Science
- Vol. 17 (2), 456-467
- https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1958.172456x
Abstract
Data on 6 lines of inbred swine and on the two-, three- and four-line crosses between them and on results of using these in topcrosses are compared for predictability from one mating system to another. The following appeared to have predictive value: pig weaning weight in inbreds with two-line crosses classified by dam-line; pig 5-month weight in two- and three-line crosses and topcrosses classified by sire-line with each other; and the ratio of 5-month to 56-day pig weights in inbreds with 5-month weight in two- and three-line crosses and topcrosses classified by sire-line. Subdivision of variance in two-line crosses for 56-day pig weights indicated that maternal effects are more important than general combining ability and that the opposite is true for 5-month pig weights. Neither showed evidence of specific combining ability. It was also indicated that there was a negative genetic correlation between additive effects in the pig and the maternal effects of the line. The possible applications of the results to the genetic improvement of swine are discussed.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Inbreeding, Selection, Linecrossing and Topcrossing in Swine. II. Linecrossing and TopcrossingJournal of Animal Science, 1958
- Effects of Inbreeding, Selection, Linecrossing and Topcrossing in Swine. I. Inbreeding and Selection1Journal of Animal Science, 1958
- Analysis of data from all possible reciprocal crosses between a set of parental linesHeredity, 1947