Rubella Syndrome After Inapparent Maternal Illness
- 1 October 1965
- journal article
- abstracts
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 110 (4), 444-446
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1965.02090030464015
Abstract
SINCE the original reports by Gregg1 and Swan,2 it has been appreciated that rubella contracted during the first trimester of pregnancy can result in an infant born with malformations. It has become commonplace in evaluating deformed babies to ask about maternal illness in the first trimester—specifically rubella, with rash and fever. However, rubella may fail to show the typical rash, and may be manifested only by posterior auricular nodes, or may even be entirely subclinical.3 The cases which comprise the present report demonstrate that rubella, documented by virus isolation, can occur in the offspring of pregnancies in which no history of rubella in the mother can be elicited. A further difficulty is evident since the recent isolation of rubella virus from infants born of pregnancies complicated by maternal rubella.4 In cases of newborns with only patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) or only cataracts, when the maternalThis publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transplacental Rubella Infection in Newly Born InfantsJAMA, 1965
- Rubella Epidemic on St. Paul Island in the Pribilofs, 1963JAMA, 1965
- Prevention of Rubella by Gamma Globulin during an Epidemic in Barrow, Alaska, in 1964New England Journal of Medicine, 1965
- Virologic and Serologic Studies on Human Products of Conception after Maternal RubellaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1964
- RUBELLA IN PREGNANCY AS ANIATIOLOGICAL FACTOR IN CONGENITAL MALFORMATION, STILLBIRTH, MISCARRIAGE AND ABORTIONBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1949