Starling resistor versus compliance. Which explains the zero-flow pressure of a dynamic arterial pressure-flow relation?
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation Research
- Vol. 67 (1), 209-220
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.67.1.209
Abstract
Arterial pressure at zero flow (Pz = 0) that is higher than venous pressure (Pv) in dynamic pressure-flow relations has been explained by the presence of an arteriolar Starling resistor (SR) mechanism (i.e., vascular waterfall) or the discharge of vascular capacitance. To determine which was predominant, I studied in vivo hind limbs of 18 anesthetized dogs in which femoral arteries were cannulated with in-line electromagnetic flow probes to measure inflow (Qin), Pv was controlled, and collateral flow was eliminated with a tourniquet. Pz = 0 was obtained by turning flow to zero. Three tests were applied: 1) Pv was raised in steps with either constant Qin or constant arterial pressure (Pa) to determine the pressure at which upstream vascular characteristics were affected by a change in Pv, 2) the time to reach Pz = 0 was varied to determine compliance effects, and 3) an equation was developed to determine if experimentally derived parameters could explain Pz = 0 without invoking an SR. With constant Qin and a Pz = 0 of 56.9 +/- 11.7 mm Hg (time to Pz = 0, 3 seconds), Pv could be raised by 9.6 +/- 6.2 to 16.3 +/- 6.0 mm Hg before Pa increased, and with constant Pa, Pv could be raised by 6.8 +/- 7.3 to 14.0 +/- 8.0 mm Hg before Qin decreased. With increasing times to reach Pz = 0, Pz = 0 initially dropped precipitously, but then decreased by only a small amount over the next 5-10 seconds even though arterial pressure was much above Pv. This could be explained by an SR mechanism with a critical pressure of 42.3 +/- 11.4 mm Hg and an arterial compliance of 0.0104 +/- 0.0023 ml.mm Hg-1 (n = 6). There was no value for the compliance that described the results when the arterial outflow pressure was Pv. Thus, this study supports the hypothesis that an SR mechanism is present in the vascular system. It is most likely precapillary, and in the resting limb, it has a value of 40-50 mm Hg. However, Pz = 0 in dynamic pressure-flow studies of less than 4 seconds is also greatly influenced by capacitance effects and the initial Pa.This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coronary pressure-flow relationships. Controversial issues and probable implications.Circulation Research, 1985
- Steady state and instantaneous pressure-flow relationships: characterisation of the canine abdominal peripheryCardiovascular Research, 1983
- Interfacial tension effects in the microvasculatureMicrovascular Research, 1981
- Zero-Flow Pressures and Pressure-Flow Relationships during Single Long Diastoles in the Canine Coronary Bed before and during Maximum VasodilationJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1981
- Diastolic coronary pressure-flow relationships investigated by induced long-wave pressure oscillationsBasic Research in Cardiology, 1981
- Dynamic pressure-flow relationships of brain blood flow in the monkeyJournal of Neurosurgery, 1974
- Experimental cerebral hemodynamicsJournal of Neurosurgery, 1974
- Measurement of peripheral vascular properties by a frequency response methodAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1971
- Critical Closing Pressure and Venous PressureAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1952
- The apparent viscosity of blood flowing in the isolated hindlimb of the dog, and its variation with corpuscular concentrationThe Journal of Physiology, 1933