The scientific basis for making guidelines and standards to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 40 (10), 1097-1117
- https://doi.org/10.1080/001401397187630
Abstract
Regulations concerning the work environment, tools, and the performance of work are at their best based on scientific evidence. Existing European directives, European and North American standards, and recent guidelines with the potential to prevent musculoskeletal disorders, are either qualitative or semiquantitative. The exception is the NIOSH lifting guide, which is highly quantitative. Of the European directives and standards, few have been developed with the primary goal of preventing musculoskeletal disorders, whereas one North American standard and another suggestion for a standard have this specific aim. In a review of epidemiological studies on low-back, neck, shoulder, and upper extremity disorders, several physical load factors were identified as risk factors for the disorders. Many of these factors have been repeatedly identified, and for different types of outcomes of an anatomical area (e.g. pain, disc herniation, disc degeneration of the low-back or neck). However, quantitative exposure-response relationships between physical load factors and disorders based on field studies are largely unknown. Experimental studies have provided a multitude of potentially useful data. It is concluded that both well-designed epidemiological studies with quantitative assessments of physical work load and valid measurements of musculoskeletal disorders, and experimental studies are needed for the future development of regulation. To determine the role of experimental studies in regulation, it should be known to what extent fatigue and other short-term responses are precursors of disorders. Regulation should be directed especially towards factors that are likely to be causative for musculoskeletal disorders. Examples of such factors are sudden overload in manual handling activities, heavy physical work involving manual handling tasks, and vibration from tools. Guidelines that are acceptable and feasible can and should be developed. The effects of such guidelines on the occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders should be investigated.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research to reality: a critical review of the validity of various criteria for the prevention of occupationally induced low back pain disabilityErgonomics, 1994
- Rapid Communication Industrial wrist motions and incidence of hand/wrist cumulative trauma disordersErgonomics, 1994
- The effect of wearing a flexible wrist splint on carpal tunnel pressure during repetitive hand activityThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1994
- Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasksErgonomics, 1993
- The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back DisordersSpine, 1993
- The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forcesErgonomics, 1991
- Back pain and exposure to whole body vibration in helicopter pilotsErgonomics, 1990
- Physiological Guidelines for the Design of Manual Lifting and Lowering Tasks: The State of the ArtAihaj Journal, 1988
- Effects of changes in sitting work posture on static neck and shoulder muscle activityErgonomics, 1986
- Prediction of Overexertion Injuries Using Biomechanical and Psychophysical ModelsAihaj Journal, 1986