The Effects of Local Government Finances on Community Growth Rates
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 18 (1), 91-105
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168201800108
Abstract
The Tiebout model of residential choice suggests that people freely shop among communities seeking a "market bundle" of local government services that best fits their preferences. Presumably, the different service/tax preferences of social groups help to explain their residential location. In this research on the suburban community growth of low-and high-income population, we find that differential service levels among communities have no relationship to income specific growth rates. However, we do find that, in contrast to low-income families, high-income families cluster in suburban communities with higher fiscal resources, giving them greater policy options in choosing service levels and tax rates.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fiscal Implications of Class SegregationUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1981
- A PATH ANALYTIC EXPLORATION OF INCOME CLUSTERING AND LOCAL INEQUALITYPolicy Studies Journal, 1981
- The Stratification of Metropolitan Suburbs, 1960-1970American Sociological Review, 1981
- Suburban Social Status: Persistence or Evolution?American Sociological Review, 1978
- An analysis of migration patterns and local government policy toward public education in the United StatesPublic Choice, 1977
- Tax Islands, Fiscal Equity, and Fiscal EqualizationPublic Finance Quarterly, 1976
- Separate and Unequal: Governmental Inequality in the MetropolisAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Local government policies and migrationPublic Choice, 1974
- Principles of urban fiscal strategyPublic Choice, 1971
- The Socio-Economic Status of Cities and SuburbsAmerican Sociological Review, 1963