Chemotherapy‐induced neuropathy
Top Cited Papers
- 14 March 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System
- Vol. 13 (1), 27-46
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8027.2008.00156.x
Abstract
Neurotoxic side effects of cancer therapy are second in frequency to hematological toxicity. Unlike hematological side effects that can be treated with hematopoietic growth factors, neuropathies cannot be treated and protective treatment strategies have not been effective. For the neurologist, the diagnosis of a toxic neuropathy is primarily based on the case history, the clinical and electrophysiological findings, and knowledge of the pattern of neuropathy associated with specific agents. In most cases, toxic neuropathies are length-dependent, sensory, or sensorimotor neuropathies often associated with pain. The platinum compounds are unique in producing a sensory ganglionopathy. Neurotoxicity is usually dependent on cumulative dose. Severity of neuropathy increases with duration of treatment and progression stops once drug treatment is completed. The platinum compounds are an exception where sensory loss may progress for several months after cessation of treatment ("coasting"). As more effective multiple drug combinations are used, patients will be treated with several neurotoxic drugs. Synergistic neurotoxicity has not been extensively investigated. Pre-existent neuropathy may influence the development of a toxic neuropathy. Underlying inherited or inflammatory neuropathies may predispose patients to developing very severe toxic neuropathies. Other factors such as focal radiotherapy or intrathecal administration may enhance neurotoxicity. The neurologist managing the cancer patient who develops neuropathy must answer a series of important questions as follows: (1) Are the symptoms due to peripheral neuropathy? (2) Is the neuropathy due to the underlying disease or the treatment? (3) Should treatment be modified or stopped because of the neuropathy? (4) What is the best supportive care in terms of pain management or physical therapy for each patient? Prevention of toxic neuropathies is most important. In patients with neuropathy, restorative approaches have not been well established. Symptomatic and other management are necessary to maintain and improve quality of life.Keywords
This publication has 162 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exposure‐toxicity relationships for tipifarnib in cancer patientsBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2007
- Rehabilitation of NeuropathiesCritical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 2007
- A randomized phase 2 study of lenalidomide therapy for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myelomaBlood, 2006
- Symptomatic and neurophysiological responses of paclitaxel- or cisplatin-induced neuropathy to oral acetyl-l-carnitineEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2005
- Comparative Adverse Effect Profiles of Platinum DrugsDrug Safety, 1995
- Severe polyneuropathy and motor loss after intrathecal thiotepa combination chemotherapyAnti-Cancer Drugs, 1990
- Levamisole and Fluorouracil for Adjuvant Therapy of Resected Colon CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Prevention of Cisplatin Neurotoxicity with an ACTH(4–9) Analogue in Patients with Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Treatment of Inadvertent Intrathecal Injection of VincristineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Genetically Determined Variability in Acetylation and Oxidation Therapeutic ImplicationsDrugs, 1985