Sensitivity of Simulated Boreal Fire Dynamics to Uncertainties in Climate Drivers
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Earth Interactions
- Vol. 11 (3), 1-21
- https://doi.org/10.1175/ei189.1
Abstract
Projected climatic warming has direct implications for future disturbance regimes, particularly fire-dominated ecosystems at high latitudes, where climate warming is expected to be most dramatic. It is important to ascertain the potential range of climate change impacts on terrestrial ecosystems, which is relevant to making projections of the response of the Earth system and to decisions by policymakers and land managers. Computer simulation models that explicitly model climate–fire relationships represent an important research tool for understanding and projecting future relationships. Retrospective model analyses of ecological models are important for evaluating how to effectively couple ecological models of fire dynamics with climate system models. This paper uses a transient landscape-level model of vegetation dynamics, Alaskan Frame-based Ecosystem Code (ALFRESCO), to evaluate the influence of different driving datasets of climate on simulation results. Our analysis included the use of climate data based on first-order weather station observations from the Climate Research Unit (CRU), a statistical reanalysis from the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis project (NCEP), and the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Model simulations of annual area burned for Alaska and western Canada were compared to historical fire activity (1950–2000). ALFRESCO was only able to generate reasonable simulation results when driven by the CRU climate data. Simulations driven by the NCEP and MM5 climate data produced almost no annual area burned because of substantially colder and wetter growing seasons (May–September) in comparison with the CRU climate data. The results of this study identify the importance of conducting retrospective analyses prior to coupling ecological models of fire dynamics with climate system models. The authors’ suggestion is to develop coupling methodologies that involve the use of anomalies from future climate model simulations to alter the climate data of more trusted historical climate datasets.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uncertainty in Temperature and Precipitation Datasets over Terrestrial Regions of the Western ArcticEarth Interactions, 2006
- Simulating the response of natural ecosystems and their fire regimes to climatic variability in AlaskaCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005
- Future Area Burned in CanadaClimatic Change, 2005
- Increasing river discharge in the Eurasian Arctic: Consideration of dams, permafrost thaw, and fires as potential agents of changeJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2004
- Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the Twentieth Century: Analyses of CO2, climate and land use effects with four process‐based ecosystem modelsGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 2001
- Mongolian Tree Rings and 20th-Century WarmingScience, 1996
- Tree ring width and density evidence of climatic and potential forest change in AlaskaGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 1995
- Predicting the effects of climate change on fire frequency in the southeastern Canadian boreal forestWater, Air, & Soil Pollution, 1995
- Effects of Multiple Fires on Nutrient Yields from Streams Draining Boreal Forest and Fen Watersheds: Nitrogen and PhosphorusCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1992
- Effects of a Windstorm and Forest Fire on Chemical Losses from Forested Watersheds and on the Quality of Receiving StreamsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1980