What Have We Learned About Interventions to Reduce Medical Errors?
- 1 March 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Public Health
- Vol. 31 (1), 479-497
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103544
Abstract
Medical errors and adverse events are now recognized as major threats to both individual and public health worldwide. This review provides a broad perspective on major effective, established, or promising strategies to reduce medical errors and harm. Initiatives to improve safety can be conceptualized as a “safety onion” with layers of protection, depending on their degree of remove from the patient. Interventions discussed include those applied at the levels of the patient (patient engagement and disclosure), the caregiver (education, teamwork, and checklists), the local workplace (culture and workplace changes), and the system (information technology and incident reporting systems). Promising interventions include forcing functions, computerized prescriber order entry with decision support, checklists, standardized handoffs and simulation training. Many of the interventions described still lack strong evidence of benefit, but this should not hold back implementation. Rather, it should spur innovation accompanied by evaluation and publication to share the results.Keywords
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global PopulationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Improving patient safety in intensive care units in MichiganJournal of Critical Care, 2008
- Simulation Technology for Skills Training and Competency Assessment in Medical EducationJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Patient safety: helping medical students understand error in healthcareQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2007
- The Many Faces of Error Disclosure: A Common Set of Elements and a DefinitionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a placeQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2007
- The predictive validity of safety climateJournal of Safety Research, 2007
- Use of a safety climate questionnaire in UK health care: factor structure, reliability and usabilityQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006
- Disclosure of medical errorsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- End‐to‐end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknessesTransfusion, 2006