Comparison of Solvents for Ex Situ Removal of Chromium and Lead from Contaminated Soil
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Environmental Engineering Science
- Vol. 14 (2), 97-104
- https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.1997.14.97
Abstract
Soil washing is one of few practical methods for the remediation of metal-contaminated soils. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001 M); nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA, 0.1 and 0.001 M), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 0.1 and 0.001 At); and HCl (0.25 to 8% v/v) were compared, in batch studies, for their ability to solubilize chromium (Cr) and lead (Pb) from a contaminated soil (Crtot = 4940 mg/kg; Pbtot = 1300 mg/kg; pH = 10.3) collected from an abandoned industrial facility. The EDTA, NTA, and SDS were reacted with the soil over a wide pH range. The extent of Cr and Pb solubilization was strongly influenced by both solution pH and chelant-metal chemistry; the hexadentate EDTA solubilized both Cr and Pb more effectively than did the tetradentate NTA. Chromium and lead recovery increased with higher EDTA concentrations, with maximum recovery occurring at greater than 1:1 ratios of chelant:metal. The 0.1 M EDTA solution was most effective in soil decontamination: 100% Pb was recovered up to pH 4.3, and 54% Cr and 96.2% Pb were recovered at approximately pH 12. The NTA was less effective: 33%–48% Cr was removed (pH 8.9–11.0), and a maximum of 38% Pb was removed (pH 4.5). The SDS recovered 30%–40.5% Pb from pH 4.4–10.9, and 29%–35% Cr from pH 2.2–3.2. A single soil washing with chelant or SDS was not sufficient to bring soil Cr and Pb concentrations below United Kingdom "trigger concentrations." The acid wash using 2% through 8% HCl removed 100% of the Cr and Pb; however, 49%–51% of the matrix solids were dissolved, which created an impractical wastewater treatment situation. A level of 1% acid was much less effective in metal removal (15.7% and 3.8% Cr and Pb recovery, respectively). The recommended washing treatment for the alkaline soil/waste mixture studied, based on pH adjustment and other practical considerations, includes 0.1 M EDTA without acidification. Key words: Chelating agent; extraction; solubilization; surfactantKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Soil-washing technology and practiceJournal of Hazardous Materials, 1995
- Washing of Zinc(II) from Contaminated Soil ColumnJournal of Environmental Engineering, 1995
- Removal of Cr(VI) from Chromium Contaminated Sites by Washing with Hot WaterHazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 1994
- Influence of electrolytes on EDTA extraction of Pb from polluted soilWater, Air, & Soil Pollution, 1992
- Chemical Fractionation and Plant Uptake of Heavy Metals in Soils Amended with Co‐Composted Sewage SludgeJournal of Environmental Quality, 1991
- On the routine determination of chromium (VI) in soilsAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 1990
- Comparative evaluation of NTA and EDTA for extractive decontamination of Pb-polluted soilsWater, Air, & Soil Pollution, 1989
- Trace Metal Chemistry in Arid‐zone Field Soils Amended with Sewage Sludge: I. Fractionation of Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb in Solid PhasesSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1982
- Experimental mobilization of metals from aquatic sediments by nitrilotriacetic acidChemical Geology, 1974
- Reactions of EDTA Complexes of Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu with SoilsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1969