Revised Approach to Detection of Cerebral Damage: Progressive Matrices Revisited
- 1 August 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 17 (1), 71-77
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.17.1.71
Abstract
The use of several indices based on Progressive Matrices performances alone fails to differentiate impairment related to psychopathology from that due to cerebral histopathological changes at a satisfactory level, although the test is an excellent indicator of the presence and extent of impairment irrespective of the impairing condition. Since psychiatric and neurological patients overlap most in impaired g-functions and least on certain measures independent of g, the latter are held to be decisive in distinguishing organic from psychopathological impairment whatever the level of intellectual competence at the time of test.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Impairment in Multiple SclerosisThe Journal of Psychology, 1962
- Psychological Assessment of Differential Impairment in Cerebral Organic Conditions and in SchizophrenicsThe Journal of Psychology, 1962
- Thinking Impairment in Acute Schizophrenic IllnessThe Journal of Psychology, 1962
- Raven's Progressive Matrices: A Review and Critical EvaluationThe Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1958
- Critique of Psychological Approaches to Brain DamageJournal of Mental Science, 1957
- Progressive Matrices Findings Associated with Cerebral HistopathologyPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1956
- AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BLOCK DESIGN ROTATION EFFECTPsychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1954