Open versus Closed Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures
- 1 October 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health
- Vol. 26 (10), 923-926
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198610000-00011
Abstract
A retrospective study was performed including only fractures involving the middle three fifths of the femoral shaft with a minimum of 2 years followup. There were 65 fractures in Group I treated with the closed technique utilizing the image intensifier. Followup averaged 4 years (Group II). Group 1 had 92% satisfactory results; Group II achieved 97% satisfactory, not statistically significantly different. Our recommendations are: 1) delaying the procedure did not appear to be advatageous; 2) excluding the fractures with segmental bicortical loss, there are limited indications for locked nails in these fractures; 3) the decision to use a specific type of internal fixation should be based on the fracture pattern, the surgeon''s experience, and the equipment available; 4) if a closed technique is chosen, be prepared to open the fracture if a satisfactory closed reduction cannot be attained. This, in our study, did not increase the risk of reducing the functional result.This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Open vs. Closed Rodding of Femurs Utilizing a Sampson RodPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1982