Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands
Open Access
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- chlamydia
- Published by BMJ in Sexually Transmitted Infections
- Vol. 81 (1), 17-23
- https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2004.010173
Abstract
Objectives:Chlamydia trachomatis (Chlamydia) is the most prevalent sexually transmitted bacterial infection and can cause considerable reproductive morbidity in women. Chlamydia screening programmes have been considered but policy recommendations are hampered by the lack of population based data. This paper describes the prevalence of Chlamydia in 15–29 year old women and men in rural and urban areas, as determined through systematic population based screening organised by the Municipal Public Health Services (MHS), and discusses the implications of this screening strategy for routine implementation. Methods: Stratified national probability survey according to “area address density” (AAD). 21 000 randomly selected women and men in four regions, aged 15–29 years received a home sampling kit. Urine samples were returned by mail and tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Treatment was via the general practitioner, STI clinic, or MHS clinic. Results: 41% (8383) responded by sending in urine and questionnaire. 11% (2227) returned a refusal card. Non-responders included both higher and lower risk categories. Chlamydia prevalence was significantly lower in rural areas (0.6%, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.1) compared with very highly urbanised areas (3.2%, 95% CI 2.4 to 4.0). Overall prevalence was 2.0% (95% CI 1.7 to 2.3): 2.5% (95% CI 2.0 to 3.0%) in women and 1.5% (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8) in men. Of all cases 91% were treated. Infection was associated with degree of urbanisation, ethnicity, number of sex partners, and symptoms. Conclusion: This large, population based study found very low prevalence in rural populations, suggesting that nationwide systematic screening is not indicated in the Netherlands and that targeted approaches are a better option. Further analysis of risk profiles will contribute to determine how selective screening can be done.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chlamydial infection: an accurate model for opportunistic screening in general practiceSexually Transmitted Infections, 2003
- Chlamydia screening in the United KingdomSexually Transmitted Infections, 2003
- Spending money to save moneySexually Transmitted Infections, 2003
- Chlamydia screening and sexual healthSexually Transmitted Infections, 2002
- What should we do about screening for genital chlamydia?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice?BMJ, 2002
- A systematic review of the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among European womenHuman Reproduction Update, 2002
- Major improvements in cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis using pooled urine specimens and high performance testingSexually Transmitted Infections, 2002
- Population‐Based Strategies for Outreach Screening of UrogenitalChlamydia trachomatisInfections: A Randomized, Controlled TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Prevention of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease by Screening for Cervical Chlamydial InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996