US physicians' attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility
- 9 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
- Vol. 120A (1), 63-71
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.10192
Abstract
Genetic testing for an inherited susceptibility to cancer is an emerging technology in medical practice. Little information is currently available about physicians' attitudes toward these tests. To assess US physicians' opinions on unresolved issues surrounding genetic testing, a 15‐min survey was administered to a stratified random sample of 1,251 physicians from 8 specialties, selected from a file of all licensed physicians in the US (response rate = 71.0%). Dependent measures included physicians' attitudes toward genetic counseling and testing qualifications, availability of guidelines, patient confidentiality and insurance discrimination issues, and clinical utility of genetic tests. More than 89% of physicians reported a need for physician guidelines, 81% thought that patients with positive genetic test results are at risk for insurance discrimination, and more than 53% thought that it was difficult to ensure the confidentiality of test results. Almost 25% indicated that genetic tests for cancer susceptibility have too many inaccurate or ambiguous results; nearly 75% thought that clear guidelines are not available for managing patients with positive test results. Only 29% of physicians reported feeling qualified to provide genetic counseling to their patients. More than 84% of oncologists considered themselves qualified to recommend genetic testing to their patients compared with 40% of primary care physicians (PCPs), and 57% of tertiary care physicians (TCPs). US physicians expressed great uncertainty about issues surrounding genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Results of this national survey underscore the need to provide physicians with clear guidelines on the use of genetic cancer susceptibility tests and effective medical training on their appropriate implementation. Published 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancerAnnals of Oncology, 2004
- Prophylactic Oophorectomy in Carriers ofBRCA1orBRCA2MutationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: Hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testingGastroenterology, 2001
- The Use and Interpretation of CommercialAPCGene Testing for Familial Adenomatous PolyposisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Cancer Genetic Susceptibility Testing: Ethical and Policy Implications for Future Research and Clinical PracticePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997
- Attitudes of Obstetrician-Gynecologists Toward DNA Testing for a Genetic Susceptibility to Breast CancerPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1996
- Interest in Learning of Personal Genetic Risk for Cancer: A General Population SurveyPreventive Medicine, 1996
- Interest in genetic testing among first‐degree relatives of breast cancer patientsAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1995
- Interest in Genetic Testing for Colon Cancer Susceptibility: Cognitive and Emotional CorrelatesPreventive Medicine, 1993
- Use of genetic testing by employers. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical AssociationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991