Rankings
Publications
Search Publications
Cited-By Search
Sources
Publishers
Scholars
Scholars
Top Cited Scholars
Organizations
About
Login
Register
Home
Publications
Possible Implications Of Vascular Damage For Tumor Cell Inactivation In Vivo: Comparison Of Different Photosensitizers
Home
Publications
Possible Implications Of Vascular Damage For Tumor Cell Inactivation In Vivo: Comparison Of Different Photosensitizers
Possible Implications Of Vascular Damage For Tumor Cell Inactivation In Vivo: Comparison Of Different Photosensitizers
BH
Barbara W. Henderson
Barbara W. Henderson
GF
Gwendolyn Farrell
Gwendolyn Farrell
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Add to library
Cite
Download
Share
Download
13 June 1989
proceedings article
Published by
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
Vol. 1065
,
2-10
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.977998
Abstract
Various different photosensitizers were compared to Photofrin® II with respect to their potential for causing direct tumor cell inactivation and/or vascular damage. GaCl-phthalocyanine of mixed sulfonation, while being 10 x more efficient than Photofrin® II in tumor cell inactivation, caused equal vascular photosensitization. Monosulfonated AlC1-phthalocyanine, on the other hand, was sparing to the vasculature, while still exhibiting good tumor cell effects. Large differences in vascular photosensitization were also observed with tetra- and monosulfonated tetraphenylporphines.© (1989) COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Keywords
DAMAGE
PHTHALOCYANINE
VASCULAR
PHOTOSENSITIZATION
PHOTOFRIN
PHOTOSENSITIZERS VARIOUS DIFFERENT
TUMOR CELL INACTIVATION
All Articles
Open Access
Cited by 11 articles