Impact of Study Quality on Outcome in Placebo-Controlled Trials of Homeopathy
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 52 (7), 631-636
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00048-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trialsThe Lancet, 1997
- St John's wort for depression--an overview and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1996
- The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviewsArchives of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Randomized Clinical Trials of Acupuncture for Asthma – a Systematic ReviewComplementary Medicine Research, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklistsControlled Clinical Trials, 1995
- Invited Commentary: Re: “A Critical Look at Some Popular Meta-Analytic Methods”American Journal of Epidemiology, 1994
- Quality Scores Are Useless and Potentially Misleading: Reply to “Re: A Critical Look at Some Popular Analytic Methods”American Journal of Epidemiology, 1994