Pain Tolerance and Athletic Participation
- 1 April 1966
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 22 (2), 383-390
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1966.22.2.383
Abstract
Using thermal, gross pressure, and muscle ischemia testing procedures to induce pain, an effort was made to determine the relationship between pain response and athletic participation by measuring the pain threshold and pain tolerance levels of three groups of Ss, i.e., contact athletes, non-contact athletes, and non-athletes. There were no significant differences between groups in pain threshold, but a highly significant difference between groups on pain tolerance, wherein the contact athlete tolerated more pain than the non-contact athlete, who in turn tolerated more pain than the non-athlete. Correlation between pain threshold and pain tolerance was .38 and that between the two measures of pain tolerance, .82.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The relationship of experimental pain tolerance to pain threshold.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1964
- The relationship of experimental pain tolearance to pain threshold: A critique of Gelfand's paper.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1964
- A Simple and Reliable Apparatus for the Measurement of PainThe American Journal of Psychology, 1962
- THE PERCEPTUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF JUVENILE DELINQUENTSJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1962
- The effect of increased salience of a membership group on pain toleranceJournal of Personality, 1960
- The Tolerance for Pain and for Sensory DeprivationThe American Journal of Psychology, 1960
- SOME PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF PAIN AND THE RELIEF OF SUFFERING*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1960
- Individual differences in pain thresholds.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1956
- Cultural Components in Responses to Pain1Journal of Social Issues, 1952
- The Adaptation of Areal PainThe American Journal of Psychology, 1936