Equivalence Trials
- 16 October 1997
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 337 (16), 1159-1161
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199710163371610
Abstract
In the typical two-group clinical trial with outcomes of either success or failure, investigators are interested in finding out whether an innovative treatment, T, reduces the frequency of failure relative to standard therapy, S. If pT and pS are used to represent the respective frequencies, this question can be answered by testing the null hypothesis of equal efficacy, H0: pT = pS, against the alternative hypothesis of superiority, HA: pT < pS. If the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis, we conclude that . . .Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Continuous Infusion of Alteplase with Double-Bolus Administration for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- A Comparison of Reteplase with Alteplase for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Unethical Trials of Interventions to Reduce Perinatal Transmission of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Developing CountriesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Efficacy of 100 mg of double-bolus alteplase in achieving complete perfusion in the treatment of acute myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- An International Randomized Trial Comparing Four Thrombolytic Strategies for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1982