Effect of intraocular lens convexity on posterior capsule opacification
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 12 (6), 655-657
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(86)80080-3
Abstract
X posterior group was significantly less than in the convex anterior group, 17.6% versus 29.3% (P value < 0.05). The type of posterior capsule opacification in the two groups was also different. In the convex posterior group, a smooth fibrous type of capsular opacification predominated; in the convex anterior group, epithelial proliferation and pearl formation as well as wrinkling of the capsule frequently occurred. The difference in opacification was reflected in the preoperative visual acuity: convex posterior 20/80, convex anterior < 20/200 (P < 0.05). aReprint requests to Thomas O. Wood, M.D., 956 Court, Room D224, Memphis, Tennessee 38105. Presented at the Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, Los Angeles, April 1986. © Williams & Wilkins 1986. All Rights Reserved....This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term discission rate after placing posterior chamber lenses with the convex surface posteriorJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1986
- Neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomyAmerican Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal, 1985
- Posterior Capsule Opacification in Pseudophakic EyesOphthalmology, 1983
- Change in effective power of posterior chamber lenses placed with the plano surface anteriorAmerican Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal, 1983
- Pathology of Intraocular Lenses in 33 Eyes Examined PostmortemOphthalmology, 1983
- Use of the neodymium-yag laser to open the posterior capsule after lens implant surgery: a preliminary reportAmerican Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal, 1980
- Management of the posterior capsule following posterior chamber lens implantationAmerican Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal, 1980
- The posterior capsule and phacoemulsificationAmerican Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal, 1978