Sociodemographic Differences in the Receipt of Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Care Following Treatment With Curative Intent
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 39 (4), 361-372
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200104000-00007
Abstract
Despite limited evidence of its effectiveness, most guidelines recommend colorectal cancer survivors undergo posttreatment surveillance care. This article describes the posttreatment use of colon e-aminations, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing, and metastatic disease testing among a managed care population. Two hundred fifty-one patients with colorectal cancer enrolled in a managed care organization at diagnosis (1/1/90–12/31/95) and treated with curative intent. Patients were identified via a Cancer Registry maintained by a large group practice. Cumulative incidences of service receipt were estimated using actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) survival analyses. Co- Proportional Hazard Models were used to evaluate the relation of patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to service receipt. Average 8-year medical care e-penditures were calculated. Within 18 months of treatment, 55% of the cohort received a colon examination, 71% received CEA testing, and 59% received metastatic disease testing. Whites were more likely than minorities to receive CEA testing (RR = 1.47, P = 0.04) and tended to be more likely to receive a colon examination (RR = 1.43, P = 0.09). As the median household income of a patient’s zip code of residence increased, so too did the likelihood of colon examination and metastatic disease testing receipt (RR = 1.09, P = 0.03 and RR = 1.12, P Among a population with financial access to care, differences were found in the receipt of colorectal cancer surveillance care by race and income. Additional investigations are needed to understand why minorities and those residing in low-income areas are less likely to receive surveillance care.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defining optimal treatment for stage II colon cancer: Does decision analysis help?Gastroenterology, 1999
- Postoperative management of stage II/III colon cancer: A decision analysisGastroenterology, 1999
- Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patientsGastroenterology, 1998
- The pattern of recurrent colorectal cancer in a prospective randomised study and the characteristics of diagnostic testsInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1997
- Five-Year Follow-up After Radical Surgery for Colorectal CancerArchives of Surgery, 1995
- Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinomaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1995
- Follow-Up of Patients with Colorectal Cancer A Meta-AnalysisAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- Role of carcinoembryonic antigen and liver function tests in the detection of recurrent colorectal carcinomaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1991
- Follow-up of patients operated on for colorectal carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgery, 1990
- The value of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982