A survey of residential carbon monoxide detector utilization among Connecticut Emergency Department patients
- 4 May 2012
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Clinical Toxicology
- Vol. 50 (5), 384-389
- https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2012.683576
Abstract
Context. The use of carbon monoxide detectors may prevent deaths due to unintentional carbon monoxide poisoning. Currently, there is limited data regarding the characteristics of residential carbon monoxide detector use. Objective. To determine the characteristics of residential carbon monoxide detector use. Methods. A survey was administered to a convenience, cross-sectional sample of Emergency Department patients between June and August 2011. Inclusion criteria included patients who were older than 18 years, able to understand written or spoken English or Spanish, and lived in independent residential settings. Survey questions assessed the presence or absence of carbon monoxide and smoke detectors within the participant's home, the frequency of regular battery changes for both devices, location of carbon monoxide detectors within the home, and reasons for not installing carbon monoxide detectors (if applicable). Correlations between racial background, geographical area of residence (urban versus suburban), and income were also assessed. Results. A total of 1030 patients were surveyed. While 97.8% of respondents reported smoke detector use, only 44.4% had home carbon monoxide detectors installed. Only 17.2% had carbon monoxide detectors installed in or near their sleeping area, the correct location for detector placement. Carbon monoxide detector usage was found to be lowest among households earning less than $25,999 per year (27.3% reported having detectors), non-Caucasians (only 42.0% of African-Americans and 24.7% of Hispanics surveyed reported using detectors compared with 57.8% of Caucasians), renters, and urban residents. Reasons given for not having a carbon monoxide detector varied; many answers were consistent with a lack of awareness of the importance of using carbon monoxide detectors. Discussion and conclusions. Residential carbon monoxide detectors were underutilized compared to smoke detectors. Increased public education, especially for minorities and lower income populations, is necessary regarding the use of carbon monoxide detectors for poisoning prevention.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attitudes about Carbon Monoxide Safety in the United States: Results from the 2005 and 2006 HealthStyles SurveyPublic Health Reports®, 2011
- Developing best practice response to carbon monoxide incidents: A toolkit for health protection frontline staffPublic Health, 2011
- Residential carbon monoxide poisoning from motor vehiclesThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2011
- Domicile-related carbon monoxide poisoning in cold months and its relation with climatic factorsThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2010
- Carbon Monoxide-Related Hospitalizations in the U.S.: Evaluation of a Web-Based Query System for Public Health SurveillancePublic Health Reports®, 2010
- An Evaluation of a Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Education ProgramHealth Promotion Practice, 2009
- Remarks to the Illinois House of Representatives Executive Committee Hearing Regarding State Carbon Monoxide Detector Act (HB 603)Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 1999
- Deaths From Unintentional Carbon Monoxide Poisoning and Potential for Prevention With Carbon Monoxide DetectorsJAMA, 1998
- Carbon monoxide … the silent killer with an audible solutionThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1996