Obstetric care in the Netherlands: Manpower substitution and differential costs
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
- Vol. 1 (2), 89-110
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.4740010203
Abstract
Trends in the Netherlands show an expanded role for obstetricians in hospital‐based prenatal and natal care, as well as a shift in postnatal care away from hospitals to domiciliary care. While general practitioners attend a steadily declining share of total births, midwives continue to play a central role in supporting over 40 per cent of all births and in attending nearly two thirds of all home births, which, in the Netherlands, is the preferred option for more than a third of childbearing women. As shown in the figures, shifts of births into hospitals and of postnatal care out of hospitals produce opposite effects on obstetric expenditures. Cost differences are primarily associated with variation in location of care, and only secondarily with variation in provider of care, underscoring the importance of contrasting styles of obstetric management and their influence on costs. In the context of these observed transitions, the increasing popularity of policlinical deliveries constitutes a pivotal force whose impact to date appears to have been neglected by planners and health care decision makers.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Birth Has Done for DoctorsWomen & Health, 1983
- Staffing Primary Care in 1990Health Care Management Review, 1981
- New Health Professions After a Decade and a Half: Delegation, Productivity, and Costs in Primary CareJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1980
- Policies toward medical technology: the case of electronic fetal monitoring.American Journal of Public Health, 1979
- Options in Maternity CareWomen & Health, 1976