Eroding stereotypes: College women's attempts to influence reluctant male sexual partners
- 1 August 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Sex Research
- Vol. 30 (3), 270-282
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499309551711
Abstract
Guided by descriptions of the traditional sexual script, researchers have examined men's, but not women's, attempts to influence a reluctant dating partner to engage in sex. In the current study, we examined both men's and women's experiences of women's attempts to influence a reluctant male dating partner to engage in sexual activity. Ninety male and 111 female participants completed a series of questionnaires assessing sexual/dating histories and attitudes toward sexuality. Participants also completed the Sexual Situation Questionnaire designed to assess the situational and behavioral characteristics of disagreements in which a woman attempted to influence a reluctant man to engage in sex. Fifty‐six percent of the participants reported having experienced such a disagreement interaction in the year prior to the study. In accordance with attribution theory, men were expected to be more likely than were women to make personal attributions for their reluctance, whereas women were expected to be more likely than were men to make situational attributions for men's refusals. Our findings supported these predictions. Most participants indicated that the woman complied with the man's indication of reluctance and used no influence behaviors. Somewhat fewer indicated that the woman complied but also used some form of influence, whereas a distinct minority indicated that the woman did not comply with the man's refusal. No influence strategy was rated consistently as having had a positive, negative, or neutral impact on the man, which indicates that influence behaviors can have varying impacts depending on the context in which the influence occurs. In general, few negative emotional or relational consequences were found to be associated with these disagreements. As most disagreements did not result in engaging in the disputed level of sexual activity, women appear to have had little success in their attempts to orchestrate sexual encounters (traditionally men's role in sexual dating interactions).Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marital satisfaction, depression, and attributions: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993
- Predicting Men's Sexual Coercion and Aggression from Attitudes, Dating History, and Sexual ResponseJournal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 1992
- Strategies of Influence in Sex and DatingJournal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1990
- Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual OffersJournal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 1989
- Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couplesThe Journal of Sex Research, 1989
- Effects of sexual arousal on men's and women's behavior in sexual disagreement situationsThe Journal of Sex Research, 1988
- Dating couples' disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacyThe Journal of Sex Research, 1988
- The death of machothink: Feminist research and the transformation of peace studiesWomen's Studies International Forum, 1984
- Self?reported sexual anxiety and arousal: The expanded sexual arousability inventoryThe Journal of Sex Research, 1984
- A longitudinal examination of fear reactions in victims of rape.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1982