Restorative resection for carcinoma of the middle 1/3 of the rectum was facilitated by the recent introduction of the staplers. Before restorative resection with end-to-end anastomosis can become the treatment of choice, it must be proved that survival prospects after restorative resection are similar to those obtained after total abdominoperineal excision. The results of curative restorative resection and total excision in 417 patients with a single carcinoma of the middle 1/3 of the rectum are examined. Between 1950-1980, the proportion of patients treated by restorative resection for carcinoma of the middle 1/3 of the rectum increased from 26 to 93%. Distribution by sex, age, tumor stage and tumor differentiation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups of patients operated upon. Cancer specific survival did not differ significantly between patients treated by restorative resection or total excision. Ten year survival rates were 60 and 59%, respectively. Survival related to tumor stage and differentiation was not influenced by the type of operation. Tumor size, greater in patients managed by total excision (P < 0.04), had no significant influence on survival prospects. The results justify sphincter preservation and suggest that increased usage of restorative resection by stapling techniques is not likely to lessen survival prospects in patients with carcinoma of the middle 1/3 of the rectum.