Cause-specific mortality: understanding uncertain tips of the disease iceberg.
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 47 (6), 491-496
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.47.6.491
Abstract
To determine the extent to which individual diseases, when recorded as being present shortly before death, were certified as causes of death. Retrospective cohort study in which the "subjects" were computerised linked records. Six districts in the Oxford Regional Health Authority area (covering a population of 1.9 million people). Linked abstracts of hospital records and death certificates for people who died within four weeks and, for some diseases, within one year of hospital admission. The percentage of people with each disease for whom the disease was recorded as the underlying cause of death, was recorded elsewhere on the death certificate, or was not certified as a cause of death at all. Three broad patterns of certification are distinguished. Firstly, there were diseases that were usually recorded on death certificates when death occurred within four weeks of hospital care of them. Examples included lung cancer (on 91% of such death certificates), breast cancer (92%), leukaemia and lymphoma (90%), anterior horn cell disease (89%), multiple sclerosis (89%), myocardial infarction (90%), stroke (93%), aortic aneurysm (87%), and spina bifida (89%). These diseases were also usually certified as the underlying cause of death. Secondly, there were diseases which, when present within four weeks of death, were commonly recorded on death certificates but often not as the underlying cause of death. Examples included tuberculosis (on 76% of such certificates; underlying cause on 54%), thyroid disease (49%; 21%), diabetes mellitus (69%; 30%) and hypertension (43%; 22%). Thirdly, there were conditions which, when death occurred within four weeks of their treatment, were recorded on the death certificate in a minority of cases only. Examples of these included fractured neck of femur (on 25% of such certificates), asthma (37%), and anaemia (22%). Not surprisingly, there was "convergence" in certification practice towards the common cardiovascular and respiratory causes of death. There was also evidence that conditions regarded as avoidable causes of death may not have been certified when present at death in some patients. When uses are made of mortality statistics alone, it is important to know which category of certification practice the disease of interest is likely to be in. Linkage between morbidity and mortality records, and multiple cause analysis of mortality, would considerably improve the ability to quantify mortality associated with individual diseases.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recording of deaths in hospital information systems: implications for audit and outcome studies.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1992
- Elective total hip replacement: incidence, emergency readmission rate, and postoperative mortality.BMJ, 1991
- Reliability of routine hospital data on poisoning as measures of deliberate self poisoning in adolescents.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1990
- "Avoidable" mortality and health services: a review of aggregate data studies.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1990
- DEATHS FROM CONDITIONS AMENABLE TO MEDICAL INTERVENTION: ARE THEY REALLY AVOIDABLE?The Lancet, 1988
- The Autopsy as a Measure of Accuracy of the Death CertificateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Changing workload in ophthalmology: some observations from routine statistics.BMJ, 1983
- GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION IN MORTALITY FROM CONDITIONS AMENABLE TO MEDICAL INTERVENTION IN ENGLAND AND WALESThe Lancet, 1983
- Motor neuron disease in England and Wales, 1959-1979.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1983
- Some problems in the use of multiple causes of deathJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1966